Comparison Tool
Compare CON Laws Side by Side
Select up to 3 states to compare every dimension of their Certificate of Need programs. Shareable via URL. Just copy and paste.
| Dimension | Michigan65/100 · Restrictive |
|---|
| CON Score | 65/100 |
| Tier | Restrictive |
| CON Status | Yes |
| Services Regulated | N/A |
| Year Enacted | N/A |
| Top HHI | N/A |
| Top Insurer Share | N/A |
| Scope | Regulated Services; **Imaging:** CT, MRI, and PET scanners. |
| Application Process | Michigan's CON law covers a broad range of healthcare services and facilities, requiring state approval for new projects, expansions, or equipment pur |
| Reform Status | The path to approval is a bureaucratic maze managed by the Department of Health & Human Services (MDHHS) and a governor-appointed commission. |
| Case Law | In a landmark case, Huron Valley Hospital's 1977 CON application was denied after local planners favored an established competitor. The subsequent law |