Montana's Scorecard
State Score
5/100
Mostly FreeNational Rank
Top 5 (Best)
State Dossier: MT
Governor
Greg Gianforte (R)
CON Enacted
1975 (Mostly Repealed)
Administering Body
Dept. of Public Health and Human Services
CON Scope
Long-Term Care Facilities Only
Key Market Players
Billings Clinic, Providence Health
What CON Covers in Montana
Montana has one of the most limited CON programs in the nation, a result of significant repeals.
Covered Services & Facilities
The program exclusively covers long-term care facilities, primarily nursing homes. Other major service lines are exempt.
| Service | CON Required? |
|---|---|
| Long-Term Care / Nursing Homes | Yes |
| Hospitals | No |
| Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) | No |
| Imaging (MRI, CT, PET) | No |
| Home Health Agencies | No |
Application & Review
The process for the remaining CON is administered by the DPHHS, but its narrow focus means few applications are filed.
- Trigger: New long-term care beds or facilities.
- Review Body: MT Dept. of Public Health and Human Services.
- Key Criteria: Public need in the proposed service area.
- Transparency: Process is public but receives little attention due to its limited scope.
Who Benefits from Montana's CON Law?
The primary beneficiaries are incumbent long-term care providers who are shielded from new competition.
With CON laws repealed for hospitals, surgery centers, and imaging, the competitive landscape for most healthcare services is open. Market concentration is driven by geography and business strategy, not regulation. The two largest systems, Billings Clinic and Providence Health, dominate through scale and network effects, particularly in more populated areas.
The remaining CON law specifically protects existing nursing homes from competition, potentially leading to higher costs and lower quality within that niche sector by creating local monopolies for long-term care.
The Human Cost: Geography Over Regulation
In Montana, the greatest barrier to healthcare access is its vast, rural landscape, not CON laws.
Unlike states with expansive CON programs where regulations are a primary barrier to new services, Montana's challenge is different. The state's low population density and large distances between communities create "medical deserts" where access is limited simply because the population cannot sustain a wide variety of facilities. The repeal of most CON laws allows providers to establish services where they see a viable market without government permission, which is critical in such an environment. The "human cost" is therefore a function of natural market limitations and geography, a problem that CON laws would likely exacerbate, not solve.
Reform Status: A Model of Repeal
Current Law (Post-Repeal)
STATUS: REFORMED
Montana stands as a success story for CON repeal. By eliminating the certificate of need requirement for hospitals, ASCs, and other critical access points, the state has prioritized market competition and provider autonomy. The only remaining vestige is the requirement for long-term care facilities.
Previous Law (Pre-Repeal)
STATUS: REPEALED
Originally enacted in 1975, Montana's former CON program was broader, covering a wider range of healthcare facilities and services. The decision to repeal these provisions reflects a legislative shift towards free-market principles in healthcare, recognizing that such laws often stifle innovation and access.
The Rojas Report Take
Montana is a case study in successful deregulation. By dismantling the vast majority of its CON regime, the state has removed artificial barriers to entry, allowing healthcare to be governed by patient need and provider initiative rather than bureaucratic approval. While the remaining protection for long-term care facilities is a flaw, it is a minor one in an otherwise exemplary free-market model. The state's primary healthcare challenge—its rural geography—is a force of nature, not of law. Montana's legislative wisdom lies in not compounding that natural challenge with man-made regulatory ones. It serves as a clear model for other states looking to escape the competitive trap of CON.