Washington
Certificate of Need Analysis
The nation's most restrictive CON law.
State Ranking
48/50
Among states with CON laws.
Governor
Bob Ferguson
(D)
Enacted
1979
Services Regulated
17+
HHI Average
4,800+
Review Time
90 Days
Scope of Regulation
What requires a state permission slip?
Regulated Services & Facilities
Washington's CON program covers a wide range of healthcare services and facilities, effectively controlling market entry and expansion.
- Hospitals & Nursing Homes
- Ambulatory Surgical Centers
- Kidney Dialysis Centers
- Home Health & Hospice Agencies
- Open Heart Surgery & Cardiac Catheterization
- Organ Transplantation
- Specialty Burn Services
- Inpatient Pediatric & Rehab Services
- Obstetric & Neonatal Intensive Care Services
The Application Gauntlet
The process is lengthy and expensive, giving incumbent providers ample opportunity to block new competitors.
| Reviewing Agency | WA Dept. of Health, CON Program |
| Application Fee | $20k - $46k+ |
| Statutory Review Time | 90-135 days |
| Competitor Intervention | Yes, as "Interested Persons" |
Market Concentration
Who benefits from the lack of competition?
Providence/Swedish
29%
Statewide Inpatient Market Share
MultiCare Health System
21%
Statewide Inpatient Market Share
Virginia Mason Franciscan
15%
Statewide Inpatient Market Share
Five systems control 40% of Washington's hospitals, with local monopolies even more pronounced.
The Human Cost
Denied care and stifled innovation.
Case Study: Denied
Apex Spine Institute, PLLC (2024)
A proposal for a new three-room ambulatory surgical facility in Richland was denied by the Department of Health. The state determined the project was not consistent with its criteria for need, financial feasibility, and cost containment—classic CON gatekeeping that protects existing hospitals from a new, specialized competitor.
Reform Status
Is change on the horizon?
No Meaningful Reform
Washington has not repealed its CON law. Instead, the state continues to actively amend and update rules and fees, signaling a commitment to maintaining the regulatory barrier. The program remains one of the most comprehensive and restrictive in the United States.
The Rojas Report Take
Washington’s Certificate of Need program is not a benign regulatory oversight; it is a state-sanctioned cartel enforcement mechanism. With a perfect score of 100 on our restrictiveness index, the state stands as a monument to anti-competitive policy. The law effectively grants a handful of large hospital systems—led by Providence, which commands nearly 30% of the inpatient market—a veto over any potential competitor.
The denial of the Apex Spine Institute’s surgical facility in 2024 is a textbook case of this protectionism in action. The state’s justifications—citing a lack of 'need' and 'cost containment'—are the standard, hollow excuses used to preserve the profits of incumbent players at the expense of patient choice and innovation. This isn't about public health; it's about protecting the bottom line of established giants.
With no serious reform efforts on the table, Washington’s healthcare market will remain a high-cost, low-competition landscape. The state isn't just failing to fix the problem; it's actively reinforcing the walls of its healthcare fortress.
Related Content
Dig deeper into our investigations.
National Investigation
The CONundrum
Our complete breakdown of Certificate of Need laws across the United States.
State Profile
Oregon CON Profile
An analysis of the neighboring state's regulatory environment.
Investigation
The 340B Hustle
$81.4 billion in drug discounts. $66.4 billion in gross margin. Zero disclosure requirements.